|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
LoBlo Fet
Blackstar Inc.
8
   |
Posted - 2012.04.16 23:27:00 -
[1] - Quote
Tradelita wrote:Interesting, except that you don't get to choose who you buy / sell from on the market.
You can chose who to buy from by right clicking that order. It would be a easy fix to the market to make it an option to choose who to sell to. For example, a patch could be made that lets us right click the sell order just like the buy order. |
LoBlo Fet
Blackstar Inc.
8
|
Posted - 2012.04.16 23:40:00 -
[2] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:LoBlo Fet wrote:Tradelita wrote:Interesting, except that you don't get to choose who you buy / sell from on the market. You can chose who to buy from by right clicking that order. It would be a easy fix to the market to make it an option to choose who to sell to. For example, a patch could be made that lets us right click the sell order just like the buy order. Bzzzt, wrong. Common misunderstanding though. http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/blog/2012/04/13/understanding-the-market/tl;dr: You /always/ buy from the cheapest sell order, in the station where you decide to buy. Just like you always sell to the highest buy order. You can pay more, or get paid less, but you can't pick the order.
Ah, yes, your right. I was forgetting that when you select the buy order to buy from, only the cheapest buy order is accessed. I was thinking that buy right clicking you could specifically select a listing. My mistake. |
LoBlo Fet
Blackstar Inc.
10
|
Posted - 2012.04.17 15:57:00 -
[3] - Quote
Caleb Ayrania wrote:Anonymity is needed on scc market. Since your trading through a middle man your broker. If you directly bring in politics to the supposed neutral markets you would get a whole new chaotic pricing.
The politics should go on the contracts market. Where bulk trade etc should belong. These should also be possible to limit access to with standing or a confirmation needed option.
The topic has been up many times before..
Perhaps the future improvments in the market should be concentrated on improving the contract system then. Right now for, pulbic contracts, its interface and useability are workable, but cumbersome. |
LoBlo Fet
Blackstar Inc.
11
|
Posted - 2012.04.17 17:56:00 -
[4] - Quote
Baby steps. First and foremost having a decent contract user interface would be a start. Then being able to accept contracts at a distance (but not too far a distance). Those seem like reasonable starting points to me. |
|
|
| |
|